3 "Pro" Drum Beats Most Drummers (Probably) Can't Play

First things first - grab your free transcription here.

I’m endlessly fascinated by drum stuff that looks easy, but is hard. In lessons/videos/etc, sometimes I need to work to make the case that there’s “another layer” of subtlety. Indeed, my first few weeks working with many drummers are spent simply discovering that that layer exists.

We can tell on the surface that there’s something Tony Williams has that we don’t, for instance. But try to go into the practice room and practice a detail that will get you closer to Tony. The picture gets pretty “pixelated” when you zoom in far enough. You can lose the forest for the trees.

That’s why I love “heuristic beats”. Beats you simply won’t be able to make sound good unless these “second layer” subtleties are in place.

No disrespect to the great drumming on either of them, but songs like ACDC’s Back in Black or Tom Petty’s You Don’t Know How it Feels are songs I’d give to a more beginner student, because either the bass line buoys you along and provides “guide posts”, or stays out of the way, allowing you to simply place your beat in approximately the right spot, and it’s going to sound great.

If you try that with Aaron Parks’ Karma, which Eric Harland made famous, it will simply sag if you don’t have high level subdivision, coordination, and dynamics.

Try it with Nate Smith’s Skip Step, and it will lose tension and momentum if your lead hand technique and beat placement aren’t near-perfect.

Try it with Corey Fonville’s drum part on Christian Scott’s Twin, and unless you can layer your 8th notes 1:1 on top of the invisible matrix the bass and piano are creating, it will not only not “snap”, but create a hot mess.

So, for fun, I decided to feature those beats in today’s video. We’ll listen to the “pro” play them, we’ll dissect what makes them hard, then we’ll take you through, step-by-step, how I’d recommend playing them.

This one was transcription-heavy, so special thanks to Chris for his help with the transcription.

Hope you enjoy!

Are Drummers Today Too Obsessed With Speed?

First things first - grab your free transcription here.

It’s hard to say exactly what made this “click”.

Maybe it was answering questions from commenters about “how fast should I go with xyz”.

Maybe it was my growing collection of thumbnails emphasizing specific percentage gains in speed in specific amounts of time.

But last week, the dam broke, and I made a social media post about it.

Speed is a tool for musicality.

It’s also a by-product of work on flow, idea generation, technique, etc.

But it’s become something more. It’s become the guaranteed “ring in case you need video views” tool.

And lest you think I’m calling anyone else out, I’ll own that I myself have happily availed myself of this lever. I’ll probably do it again.

But for just one video, I decided to weigh in on the contrary. To “counter balance” things.

I believe the prevalence of “get more speed” in drum instruction is out -of-pace with its utility.

If you want Andy-Prado-like chops, a large amount of that work is done slowly. (Though, yes, you eventually have to practice fast to see what “lies well” on the kit.)

And if you don’t, rest easy: the vast majority of practical drumming doesn’t require it.

But not so easy - you still have to put in the work on timing, cleanliness, and idea flow. (Doh!)

In any case, please enjoy my treatise on the state of speed in 2025.

As usual, leave a polite comment below.

Why Drum Beats Sound So Different Today

First things first - grab your free transcription here.

Drum beats had one thing constant from almost their inception until just a few years ago, and now they don’t.

Of course, I’m speaking about the snare drum.

Mainstay of “holding it down” since almost before drum kits were a thing. If you follow back to its origins, many historians credit Wynonie Harris as one of the earliest precursors. Snare on “2 and 4”.

Follow it earlier than that, to New Orleans. Snare on 2 and 4, with shades of gray, at least with press rolls.

Follow it forward: the rock age. Funk. Reggae. Electronica. Punk. Alternative rock. Modern live arrangements.

All with the snare drum as the centerpiece of the backbeat.

Until now.

I’m not saying the snare will ever go away, but increasingly, drummers are using another device as their “backbeat locus”. The stack.

But wha?

How did this seemingly-very-niche invention, by the great Trevor Lawrence in 2017/18 do what all the other drum inventions failed to do.

That includes tambourines, bells on the drums, bongos on the kick, Zil Bells, gong drums, synth pads, and a partridge in a pear tree.

Nothing doing. The snare still reined supreme.

To understand why the stack is “seeping in” to modern drum beats, in my humble opinion, we need to go back the origin of “beats” as we know them: worship songs in black churches around the turn of the century. And what do we find in recordings from that period? Hand claps.

If we take the paradigm that the snare was a “good enough” replacement for hand claps in music, it all makes sense.

Whatever else you’re doing, you have to have that “2 and 4”.

And nothing really messed with the snare when came to being a decent facsimile of the clap. (We didn’t get good synthesized claps until the early ‘80s. And synth pads are heavy, expensive, delicate to transport, and require a PA/monitor system to use.)

Until Trevor’s invention. Acoustic. Compact. Fits in a cymbal bag. Does not require amplification.

In addition to understanding how/why the stack is slowly competing with the snare for backbeat primacy, we’ll all look at some very specific beats, and ways of using it.

Hope you enjoy!

I Wish Someone Had Told Me This About Double Stoke Rolls

First things first - grab your free transcription here.

It’s often the case that when we seek to understand an abstract concept, we see lots of differing opinions among “experts”. Plenty of great drummers have good double stroke rolls, so why is it that opinions vary so widely on how to teach/learn them?

That could extend to videos in which the presenter has some unorthodox learning method. Like me in the thumbnail for this week’s video. “What are the odds that all the great drummers throughout history, from Papa Jo to Tony Williams to modern greats all did this thing, and this one random guy is going to come up with something new or novel in the approach. I guess they were all wrong?”

Such is the question in my head whenever I seek to deconstruct a physical movement.

To start with, those great drummers weren’t wrong. If you can do it, there’s not much more to say. The issue comes with communication.

Imagine there’s a feeling of double strokes being right. We don’t have telepathy or Neurolink, so I can’t connect a cable from my brain to your brain to incept you with the feeling. So I have to do the next best thing: use words, and visuals.

Double strokes, and hand technique in general is especially difficult, because the movements are small, and they’re often hidden from view, inside the hand. (As opposed to, say, a golf swing.) So visuals only get you so far.

In my opinion, much of drum instruction tackles this problem by getting the student “in the territory” of correctness, then assuming if they just add reps, they’ll eventually get it.

In that paradigm, this video is just an attempt to geolocate that neighborhood more precisely. i.e. with this method, you’ll need hopefully less time to get the feeling for yourself.

We do that by focussing on the hardest part of the double stroke - what’s actually happening in the bounced double - and slowing it down, to almost infinity. In that region, the drop-catch mechanics that tons of great drummers do without thinking, but which Gordy Knudtson pointed out most effectively, are our key.

If we can increase the time between the first and the second double to infinity, we solve the most pernicious problems of double strokes: the evenness between strokes without forcing it, and the “dead zone” between articulating and bouncing.

Come with me on the journey;)

Hope you enjoy!